Kenya’s Legal Notice No. 134 of 2026 does more than bring the Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASP) Act, 2025 into operation. It provides the first detailed blueprint for how cryptocurrency exchanges, wallet providers, stablecoin issuers and other digital asset businesses will be licensed, supervised and held accountable within one of Africa’s fastest-growing digital economies.
The regulations arrive at a pivotal moment. Cryptocurrency adoption has continued to expand across Kenya, with digital assets increasingly used for cross-border remittances, international trade, investment and treasury management. At the same time, policymakers have been working to strengthen the country’s anti-money laundering framework, improve oversight of emerging financial technologies and meet commitments linked to Kenya’s removal from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list.
For businesses already operating in the market, Legal Notice No. 134 provides long-awaited regulatory certainty. For prospective entrants, however, it also establishes significantly higher expectations around governance, capital, liquidity, cybersecurity and consumer protection than many had anticipated.
The regulations therefore mark more than the beginning of crypto licensing. They illustrate how Kenya intends to position virtual assets within its broader financial system.
That approach did not emerge overnight. When the VASP Bill was first published in 2025, debate largely centred on whether the proposed framework placed too much emphasis on compliance at the expense of innovation. Industry participants questioned provisions relating to licensing, privacy, capital requirements and the treatment of decentralized finance, while regulators argued that stronger oversight was necessary as digital assets became more integrated into the financial system.
Over the following year, that conversation became more nuanced. During industry consultations, blockchain conferences and public stakeholder engagements, exchanges, stablecoin providers, financial institutions and legal experts broadly agreed that regulation was necessary. The discussion gradually shifted toward implementation: whether licensing requirements would be proportionate, whether startups would have a realistic route into the regulated market and whether Kenya could strengthen consumer protection without discouraging innovation.
The final regulations reflect that evolution. Treasury revised several proposals after receiving industry feedback, including reducing some of the draft capital requirements while retaining a framework built around prudential supervision. Rather than abandoning strong oversight, policymakers refined the rules before bringing them into force.
Why Legal Notice No. 134 Matters
Unlike the VASP Act, which established the legal framework for regulating virtual asset services, Legal Notice No. 134 sets out the practical rules that licensed firms must follow.
The regulations define licensing categories, establish paid-up and liquid capital requirements, prescribe governance standards, require cybersecurity and operational risk controls, introduce reserve obligations for stablecoin issuers and outline reporting responsibilities for firms operating within Kenya’s digital asset market.
Together, those provisions reveal a deliberate regulatory philosophy. Rather than treating cryptocurrency businesses primarily as technology startups, Kenya is placing many virtual asset providers within a prudential framework that resembles the oversight applied to other parts of the financial sector.
That distinction matters because it reframes the debate. The central question is no longer whether Kenya intends to regulate crypto aggressively; the regulations leave little doubt on that point. The more important question is whether the final framework strikes the right balance between financial stability, market integrity and the continued growth of domestic blockchain innovation.
Capital Requirements Reflect a Prudential Model
The regulations make one point unmistakably clear: Kenya intends to regulate virtual assets as part of the financial system rather than as an emerging technology sector.
That approach is most evident in the capital requirements attached to different categories of virtual asset service providers. Stablecoin issuers face the highest threshold, requiring **KES 300 million in paid-up capital** and **liquid capital of KES 60 million or 100 percent of current liabilities for at least 30 days, whichever is higher**. Wallet providers must maintain **KES 150 million** in paid-up capital, while tokenisation businesses and initial coin offering (ICO) providers face lower thresholds aligned with their respective activities.
Those figures, however, differ from the draft regulations released earlier this year. Treasury reduced the proposed paid-up capital requirement for stablecoin issuers from **KES 500 million to KES 300 million**, while lowering the corresponding liquidity requirement from **KES 100 million to KES 60 million** after industry consultations. The revisions followed concerns from market participants, including the Virtual Assets Association of Kenya (VAAK), which argued that the original proposals could discourage investment and make Kenya less competitive as a destination for digital asset businesses.
The final framework also distinguishes between business models rather than applying a single standard across the industry. Investment advisory licences, for example, no longer require minimum paid-up or liquid capital, creating a pathway for individuals and smaller firms to participate in regulated activities without facing the same financial barriers as custodians or stablecoin issuers.
Rather than abandoning strong oversight, Treasury appears to have recalibrated the framework. The reductions acknowledge industry concerns while retaining a prudential licensing model designed for firms that hold customer assets or perform systemically important functions.
Why Stablecoin Issuers Face the Highest Bar
The strictest requirements apply to stablecoin issuers because these businesses resemble financial institutions more closely than many other virtual asset providers.
Under Legal Notice No. 134, issuers must maintain reserves invested in low-risk assets, hold sufficient liquid capital, segregate customer assets and satisfy redemption obligations. Those measures are intended to ensure token holders can redeem their assets even during periods of market stress.
The emphasis reflects how stablecoins are already being used within Kenya’s economy. Businesses increasingly rely on dollar-pegged tokens to settle international payments, importers use them to pay overseas suppliers, members of the diaspora are turning to them for cross-border remittances, and multinational companies have adopted them for treasury operations that can settle faster than conventional banking channels.
By imposing higher prudential standards on issuers, policymakers appear to be treating stablecoins less as speculative crypto assets and more as payment infrastructure with broader implications for financial stability.
The AML Case That Helps Explain the Regulations
The regulations also arrive against the backdrop of stronger anti-money laundering enforcement.
In July, the Assets Recovery Agency secured preservation orders freezing approximately **KES 115 million** linked to an investigation involving cryptocurrency wallets, international remittance services, shell companies and bank accounts. Court filings allege that investigators traced transactions across Binance wallets, USDT transfers, intermediary accounts and cross-border payment networks as part of an alleged money-laundering scheme involving more than **KES 300 million**.
The allegations remain before the courts, but the investigation illustrates why regulators have placed greater emphasis on customer due diligence, transaction reporting, record keeping and cooperation between virtual asset service providers and agencies such as the Financial Reporting Centre, Directorate of Criminal Investigations, Central Bank of Kenya and Capital Markets Authority.
Viewed in isolation, the licensing requirements can appear restrictive. Viewed alongside the country’s broader anti-money laundering agenda, they form part of a wider effort to strengthen oversight of digital financial activity.
That objective has become more pressing since Kenya was placed on the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list in February 2024. Among the country’s commitments are stronger customer due diligence, improved beneficial ownership verification, more effective suspicious transaction reporting and tighter supervision of sectors vulnerable to illicit financial flows. The virtual asset regulations provide one mechanism for meeting those commitments while bringing a previously fragmented sector within a formal supervisory framework.
Kenya and the United States Are Solving Different Problems
When debate over Kenya’s crypto regulations began in 2025, comparisons with the United States largely focused on philosophy. As Washington reconsidered parts of its approach to decentralized finance, Kenya appeared to be moving toward stricter oversight.
That comparison is less persuasive today.
The United States is regulating one of the world’s most mature capital markets. Kenya is pursuing a different set of priorities: formalising an unregulated digital asset market, strengthening anti-money laundering controls, working toward removal from the FATF grey list and protecting one of Africa’s largest digital payments ecosystems.
Those objectives naturally produce a different regulatory framework.
The result is not simply a tougher version of crypto regulation. It is a model that treats virtual assets as part of the country’s financial infrastructure, with licensing, capital, liquidity and governance requirements resembling those found elsewhere in the regulated financial sector.
The Sandbox May Determine Whether Local Innovation Keeps Pace
One concern raised consistently during industry consultations was whether smaller Kenyan firms would have a realistic path into a regulated market.
That debate did not begin with Legal Notice No. 134. Months before the regulations were gazetted, officials from the Capital Markets Authority (CMA) were already positioning the regulatory sandbox as an entry point for innovators developing virtual asset products.
The final regulations reinforce the importance of that approach.
Although Treasury moderated several of its initial proposals by lowering capital requirements for some categories of businesses, the prudential thresholds remain beyond the reach of many early-stage startups. The sandbox therefore becomes more than a testing environment. It could become the bridge between innovation and full regulatory compliance.
The question is no longer whether the capital requirements are high. They are. The more important question is whether promising businesses can realistically progress from the sandbox into licensed operations without relocating to jurisdictions with lower barriers to entry.
Implementation Will Matter More Than the Regulations
The regulations answer many questions about licensing and supervision, but they also leave practical issues that will only become clear during implementation.
Industry participants have pointed to questions ranging from access to banking services and professional indemnity insurance to supervisory capacity and cross-border compliance for firms operating across multiple jurisdictions.
Those concerns were raised repeatedly during the Kenya Blockchain & Crypto Conference 2026, where industry representatives generally accepted that regulation was necessary but urged policymakers to ensure implementation remained practical and proportionate.
The regulations also place significant responsibilities on the Central Bank of Kenya and the Capital Markets Authority. Beyond issuing licences, both regulators will be expected to supervise a rapidly evolving sector where technology, business models and financial risks often develop faster than traditional regulatory cycles.
Success will depend not only on the strength of the rules but also on how consistently they are applied, how quickly regulatory decisions are made and whether innovators can engage constructively with supervisors.
A Framework That Balances Stability and Innovation
Legal Notice No. 134 reflects a policy choice that has become clearer over the past year.
Rather than treating virtual assets primarily as a startup sector, Kenya has chosen to regulate much of the industry as part of its financial system. The paid-up capital thresholds, liquidity requirements, reserve obligations, governance standards and oversight by the Central Bank of Kenya and the Capital Markets Authority all point toward a prudential regulatory model.
At the same time, the final regulations also show that consultation influenced the outcome. Treasury reduced several of its original capital proposals after industry feedback and differentiated requirements across business categories instead of applying a single standard to every virtual asset provider.
Whether that balance proves successful will depend less on the regulations themselves than on their implementation. If the licensing framework, supervisory approach and CMA sandbox provide a credible route for local firms to grow into fully regulated businesses, the framework could strengthen confidence in Kenya’s digital asset market while supporting responsible innovation.
If those pathways prove too difficult to navigate, however, the market may gradually become dominated by well-capitalized incumbents and international operators, limiting opportunities for the next generation of Kenyan blockchain companies.
The debate, therefore, is no longer about whether Kenya should regulate virtual assets. That question has been settled. The challenge now is ensuring that a framework designed to safeguard financial stability also leaves enough room for domestic innovation to flourish.
Download the free Kaspersky SMB Cybersecurity Guide here to learn how businesses can move beyond traditional antivirus and build a more resilient approach to cybersecurity.
Go to TECHTRENDSKE.co.ke for more tech and business news from the African continent and across the world.
Follow us on WhatsApp, Telegram, Twitter, and Facebook, or subscribe to our weekly newsletter to ensure you don’t miss out on any future updates. Send tips to editorial@techtrendsmedia.co.ke
