Kenya's AI Economy Is Growing, and the Competition Authority Wants to Keep Pace

Kenya is preparing for a new era of AI competition regulation as the Competition Authority of Kenya (CAK) responds to the growing influence of algorithms, Big Data and digital platforms on how businesses compete. The regulator says artificial intelligence is creating new competition challenges that traditional investigative methods may struggle to uncover, prompting investments in digital forensic capabilities and a broader focus on technology-driven business practices.

While AI has become a productivity tool for businesses across banking, telecommunications, retail and e-commerce, CAK believes the same technologies could also make anti-competitive conduct harder to detect.

In its Annual Report and Financial Statements for the year ended June 30, 2025, the Competition Authority says digital transformation is changing how businesses compete and how regulators investigate market conduct.

The report notes that artificial intelligence and Big Data can improve operational efficiency, automate commercial decisions and generate valuable market insights. At the same time, those technologies may allow companies to coordinate pricing, analyse competitors or manage procurement in ways that leave fewer traditional traces for investigators.

“We recognize that businesses could leverage Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Big Data to distort markets, making their covert operations hard to detect,” the Authority states in the report.

The regulator also notes that cartel investigations already take several years to complete, and digital technologies add another layer of complexity to evidence gathering.

Competition enforcement has traditionally focused on practices such as price fixing, market allocation and abuse of dominance through contracts, communications and financial records.

AI introduces a different challenge.

Modern businesses can deploy automated pricing software, predictive analytics and machine learning models that react to market conditions in real time. Regulators around the world are examining whether such systems could facilitate tacit coordination between competitors without direct human communication.

For Kenya, that means competition investigations may rely less on paper records and more on analysing digital evidence, software behaviour and electronic transactions.

Although CAK’s report does not identify specific AI-related investigations, it makes clear that digital markets will receive greater regulatory attention under its current strategic plan.

One of the report’s most notable developments is the establishment of a digital forensic laboratory.

According to CAK, the facility will support evidence collection, analysis and reporting during investigations involving electronic records and digital systems.

That investment reflects the reality that businesses now generate large volumes of digital data through online transactions, cloud services and automated platforms. Analysing those records requires specialised tools and technical expertise that extend beyond conventional competition investigations.

The Authority says the forensic laboratory will strengthen its ability to investigate complex cases as commerce becomes more digitised.

Several sectors stand out because of their growing reliance on AI and data analytics.

Banks are using AI to assess creditworthiness, detect fraud and personalise financial services.

Telecommunications companies apply machine learning to manage networks, predict customer behaviour and optimise pricing.

E-commerce platforms rely on recommendation engines, search rankings and automated pricing to connect buyers and sellers.

Retailers also use data-driven inventory management and customer analytics to guide commercial decisions.

None of these technologies are inherently anti-competitive. The concern for regulators is whether they could be used to restrict competition, disadvantage rivals or harm consumers.

Board Chairman Shaka Kariuki says future enforcement will remain focused on anti-competitive conduct while adapting to emerging technologies.

The Authority also plans to strengthen investigations into abuse of buyer power, consumer protection cases and competition concerns across digital markets.

Kenya’s approach reflects a broader international conversation about how competition authorities should oversee AI-powered markets.

Regulators in Europe, the United Kingdom and the United States have all examined the competitive impact of large digital platforms, algorithmic pricing systems and the concentration of data among major technology companies. Rather than introducing entirely new competition laws, many authorities are adapting existing legal frameworks to address how AI influences market behaviour.

The conversation is also gathering pace across Africa. The recently released Africa AI Governance Index 2026, developed by the Africa AI Policy Lab and Lawyers Hub, found that while many African countries have adopted or are drafting national AI strategies, implementation continues to lag behind. The report argues that governments are now moving beyond policy documents toward building institutions, enforcement capacity and regulatory oversight capable of governing AI in practice.

Against that backdrop, CAK’s investment in digital forensic capabilities reflects a wider effort across the continent to strengthen the institutions responsible for overseeing AI-driven markets. Rather than treating AI solely as an innovation opportunity, regulators are also preparing for the competition and consumer protection questions that accompany wider adoption.

The regulatory focus also comes as Kenya positions itself as a regional destination for AI infrastructure. Invest Kenya says the country is seeing growing interest in green data centres and AI investments, supported by its renewable energy mix and strategic location. As more AI-powered services, cloud infrastructure and digital platforms are established locally, competition oversight is likely to become a more prominent part of Kenya’s wider digital economy agenda.

The Authority also plans to conduct more market studies to identify barriers to competition and consumer welfare concerns before formal investigations begin.

For companies operating in Kenya’s digital economy, the report offers an early indication of where regulatory attention is headed.

Businesses adopting AI should ensure automated systems operate transparently, maintain appropriate governance controls and comply with competition law alongside data protection and consumer protection requirements.

That expectation extends beyond large technology companies. Financial institutions, telecommunications providers, digital marketplaces and other organisations deploying AI for pricing, procurement, customer engagement or decision-making may face greater scrutiny over how those systems affect market competition.

The message from CAK is not that artificial intelligence itself is a problem. Rather, as algorithms become embedded in pricing, procurement and platform operations, regulators expect businesses to remain accountable for how those technologies influence competition.

Kenya’s digital economy continues to expand, and the Competition Authority is preparing for a marketplace where software, data and algorithms carry as much regulatory attention as traditional business practices.

Download the free Kaspersky SMB Cybersecurity Guide here to learn how businesses can move beyond traditional antivirus and build a more resilient approach to cybersecurity.