The iPhone’s podcast app was the default home for audio. It anchored commutes, workouts, and idle hours, embedding itself into daily routine with little friction. That familiarity entrenched Apple at the center of podcast distribution. Having laid the rails early, the company largely stepped back, leaving creators, networks, and advertisers to compete across infrastructure it controlled.
Now it wants video.
The overhaul inside Apple Podcasts replaces RSS video delivery with HLS streaming, tightens playback controls, preserves transcripts, and introduces dynamic ad insertion for video. It is technical on the surface. Underneath, it is financial. Apple’s video podcast strategy is less about aesthetics and more about inventory.
The question hanging over the move is not whether Apple can support video. It can. The question is whether it waited too long to matter.
The Gravity Problem
Podcasting did not stay audio-only. Audiences drifted toward screens. Open YouTube and you find podcast clips next to gaming streams and political commentary. Open Spotify and video now sits alongside music and audiobooks. Neither platform depends on podcasts for survival. Podcasts extend their ecosystems.
Apple’s app does one thing.
That difference compounds. Billions already open YouTube daily. Spotify is the default music player for much of the world. Podcasts slip into existing routines. Apple Podcasts requires intention. And intention is fragile.
Despite that, Apple still leads in audio-only listening. That dominance has masked erosion elsewhere. By April 2024, YouTube and Spotify together accounted for 60% of weekly podcast consumption, according to Cumulus Media and Signal Hill Insights. Video did not merely add a format. It altered where discovery happens.
Apple’s answer is to integrate video more deeply inside its own walls. Users can toggle between audio and video while locking the phone. Podcasters can insert dynamic ads into both formats through hosting providers. The engineering looks tidy. The strategic terrain is not.
Advertising Is the Real Pivot
Digital video ad spending in the US reached $62.1 billion in 2024, according to the Interactive Advertising Bureau. Podcast advertising totaled $2.43 billion in the same period. That gap explains the urgency.
Audio podcast ads, particularly host-read placements, often command $10 to $14 CPM in programmatic marketplaces. Video inventory can fall into high single digits per thousand impressions. On a per-impression basis, video does not always win. In aggregate, video budgets dwarf audio.
Apple’s calculation appears straightforward. If even a portion of its audio audience adopts video inside the app, it can tap into a much larger advertising pool. At some point later this year, Apple plans to charge a fee tied to dynamic ads served through the platform. That introduces a new revenue stream for the company itself, not just for creators.
There is tension embedded here. Podcasting built its economic logic on intimacy. A host speaking directly into headphones carries a trust premium. Insert lower-priced programmatic video spots into that environment and the economics flatten. Networks that rely on dynamic audio ads may hesitate before surrendering stable margins for speculative scale.
The industry has spent the last decade trying to monetize back catalogs with automation. Now it faces a familiar dilemma: scale or scarcity.
Ecosystem Versus Utility
Apple’s disadvantage is not technological. It is structural.
YouTube offers recommendation machinery that thrives on video. A podcast clip can surface to someone who has never typed the word “podcast.” Spotify blends podcasts into algorithmic playlists. In both cases, podcasts benefit from adjacent content.
Apple Podcasts does not offer adjacent anything.
That isolation matters as video personalities increasingly drive the medium. Short clips circulate on social platforms before full episodes ever load. Creators build audiences first, then distribute episodes. The center of gravity has moved toward the creator, not the platform.
Apple’s new architecture makes it easier for podcasters to manage video and ads without abandoning their hosting providers. That reduces friction. It does not create cultural heat. Discovery remains the unspoken weakness.
And yet, Apple does not need to win the culture war outright. It needs to defend yield per user inside its installed base of iPhone owners. That is a narrower ambition. It may be enough.
Networks Under Pressure
Large podcast networks once believed pooling impressions across dozens of shows would deliver stability. Automated audio marketplaces promised revenue without armies of sales staff. Scale became the shield.
Video complicates that thesis. Premium video integrations often require bespoke production. A host interviewing an animated character to promote a brand demands coordination. That kind of advertising does not scale cleanly across 40 shows with one sales team.
If video becomes the dominant monetization format, networks may need to invest in production staff, editors, creative directors, and salespeople who can broker integrated deals. Costs rise. Margins compress. Smaller creator-led operations with focused teams may prove more adaptable.
Streaming platforms have noticed. Netflix Walt Disney through Hulu, and Fox’s Tubi have explored podcast-adjacent programming. Video podcasts are creeping into spaces once reserved for traditional series. The boundary between a talk show and a podcast episode looks thinner by the quarter.
Apple enters this terrain with strong hardware distribution and deep pockets. It does not enter with first-mover advantage in video podcast culture.
Too Late or Precisely Timed?
The “too late” argument rests on behavior. Audiences already associate video podcasts with YouTube. Spotify has spent years acclimating users to on-screen hosts. Creators who prioritize video often design their production around those platforms.
Apple’s counterargument rests on leverage. The iPhone ecosystem remains vast. If video playback inside Apple Podcasts feels seamless, some users may never leave. Audio listeners who occasionally glance at a screen might accept the hybrid model without reconsidering their app of choice.
The decisive variable is not technology. It is habit.
If Apple’s video podcast strategy changes user habit even marginally, the financial upside could be meaningful. If it fails to alter behavior, Apple becomes a competent follower in a market it once defined.
The more interesting tension lies beneath market share charts. Podcasting began as an open, RSS-driven medium that required little gatekeeping. Moving video distribution to HLS under Apple’s control tightens that openness. RSS remains supported, for now. Encouragement often precedes consolidation.
The industry is entering a period where distribution pipes are less neutral and more proprietary. Apple is not alone in that approach. It is simply arriving at it later than its competitors.
The Coming Reckoning
Advertising will determine the outcome. If brand budgets migrate into Apple-hosted video inventory at scale, creators will follow the money. If CPM compression erodes perceived value, networks may hold back.
Apple has chosen revenue expansion over purism. The move is rational. It is also revealing. Podcasting is no longer a niche audio format fighting for legitimacy. It is part of the digital video economy, subject to the same pressures that shape streaming and social media.
Apple once defined podcasting’s infrastructure. Now it is defending its slice of a broader entertainment market. The app that lived comfortably in the background wants to be seen.
Whether the audience wants to look is the part no product announcement can resolve.
Go to TECHTRENDSKE.co.ke for more tech and business news from the African continent and across the world.
Follow us on WhatsApp, Telegram, Twitter, and Facebook, or subscribe to our weekly newsletter to ensure you don’t miss out on any future updates. Send tips to editorial@techtrendsmedia.co.ke
