Kenya’s Starlink Network Now Depends On Ground Infrastructure In Nairobi
Latency dropped after Nairobi became part of Starlink’s network, placing local infrastructure at the centre of performance
Satellite internet has always carried a contradiction. The promise is proximity without infrastructure. The reality, at least until recently, was distance hiding somewhere else in the network.
For Starlink users in Kenya, that contradiction became visible in numbers. Latency, the delay between sending and receiving data, fell from about 296ms to roughly 39ms in 2025 after the company activated a local point of presence in Nairobi. Ookla data suggests an 87 percent reduction, one of the steepest improvements recorded on the network globally.
On paper, the change looks technical. In practice, it altered how the service feels. Video calls stopped talking over themselves. Online games responded when buttons were pressed rather than moments later. The internet felt closer, even though the satellites remained hundreds of kilometres above the earth.
That distinction matters. The improvement did not come from space. It came from the ground.
The Ground Beneath Satellite Internet
The popular image of satellite broadband suggests independence from terrestrial networks. The Nairobi deployment complicates that narrative. Starlink’s system still depends on terrestrial fibre once data reaches earth. The point of presence functions as a handover point, moving traffic from satellite links into local internet exchanges instead of routing it through distant gateways abroad.
Before this infrastructure existed locally, Kenyan traffic often travelled across continents before returning. The satellite hop was only part of the delay. Geography inside the internet itself did the rest.
This is why latency dropped so sharply. The distance shortened in practical terms, not orbital ones. Research into satellite networks has shown similar patterns elsewhere. Regions with nearby infrastructure see performance approach terrestrial networks, while areas without it carry penalties even when satellite coverage is strong.
In other words, satellite internet begins to resemble conventional internet the moment enough ground infrastructure exists beneath it.
A Fix That Followed Congestion
The Nairobi deployment did not arrive in isolation. It followed a period of strain. By late 2024, demand had overtaken capacity in urban areas, forcing Starlink to pause new sign-ups to prevent congestion. Registrations only resumed after upgrades expanded network handling capacity.
That episode revealed an uncomfortable truth for a service marketed on abundance. Satellite constellations still face limits. Each beam carries finite capacity, and urban density compresses that capacity quickly.
The latency improvement therefore reads partly as repair. Performance gains came alongside a reset of expectations. The service had to behave less like an experimental frontier technology and more like an ISP managing traffic flows in crowded cities.
Kenya became an early example of that adjustment.
Speed Remains The Uneven Variable
Latency improved dramatically. Speed did not follow with the same consistency. Ookla data placed median download speeds around 44 Mbps in September 2025, a respectable figure but one that fluctuates depending on demand and location.
This unevenness reflects how satellite systems distribute bandwidth. Rural users often report faster and more stable connections because fewer subscribers share the same capacity. Urban areas, where fibre networks already exist, create the opposite condition.
The result is an unusual competitive dynamic. Starlink performs best where traditional infrastructure is weakest. Yet improvements such as the Nairobi point of presence make it more usable in cities, bringing it into direct comparison with fibre providers that still retain lower latency and more predictable speeds.
The service improves technically at the same moment competition becomes harder commercially.
The Economics Behind The Improvement
Performance upgrades also intersect with pricing realities. Starlink hardware and monthly fees remain higher than many fixed broadband alternatives in Kenya, which has limited mass adoption in urban markets where fibre prices are lower.
Lower latency does not automatically change that equation. It makes the service more viable for certain use cases, remote work, content creation, or businesses operating outside fibre coverage. It does not erase the cost gap.
This tension explains why subscriber growth has not moved in a straight line. Periods of improved performance have coincided with subscriber losses and market share pressure from local providers expanding fibre and wireless offerings.
Infrastructure solved one problem while exposing another. Performance alone does not determine adoption.
Kenya As A Case Study For Satellite Internet’s Limits
Kenya’s experience offers a glimpse into how low-earth-orbit satellite networks mature. Early enthusiasm tends to focus on coverage. Later stages revolve around integration with existing internet architecture.
The lesson is simple but often overlooked. Satellite coverage is not the same as network quality. The latter depends on ground investment, routing efficiency, and proximity to internet exchange points.
This raises broader questions about where satellite internet fits long term. In regions where fibre expansion continues, Starlink may settle into a complementary role rather than a replacement. In remote regions, the opposite may happen, with satellite connectivity becoming the primary layer and terrestrial networks filling gaps where economically viable.
The technology does not erase infrastructure. It rearranges where infrastructure matters most.
The Next Constraint Is Less Visible
Latency in Kenya may continue to decline as more satellites launch and software improves, according to company statements. The larger question is whether future limits will come from physics or economics.
As more users join, capacity pressures return. As infrastructure expands, costs rise. As performance improves, expectations follow. Satellite internet moves closer to terrestrial standards, and with that proximity comes comparison.
Kenya’s experience suggests the next phase of satellite broadband will be less about reaching new places and more about negotiating coexistence with existing networks. The sky solved one problem. The ground, as it turns out, remains where the harder decisions sit.
[Secure Your Seat at Africa Tech Summit Nairobi 2026 | February 11–12 here] Use code TTRENDS10 at checkout to save 10% on your pass and join the leaders building Africa’s $1 trillion cross-border payment future.
Go to TECHTRENDSKE.co.ke for more tech and business news from the African continent.
Follow us on WhatsApp, Telegram, Twitter, and Facebook, or subscribe to our weekly newsletter to ensure you don’t miss out on any future updates. Send tips to editorial@techtrendsmedia.co.ke
