Nedbank Wins CMA Nod to Take Control of NCBA as Shareholders Line Up

Last week, the Nedbank Group received what may prove the most politically delicate approval in its proposed acquisition of approximately 66% of NCBA Group. The Capital Markets Authority granted an exemption from the obligation to launch a mandatory offer for 100% of NCBA’s shares under Kenya’s takeover regulations.

That exemption is not a procedural footnote. Under the Capital Markets (Takeovers and Mergers) Regulations, 2002, crossing certain ownership thresholds typically compels an acquirer to extend an offer to all remaining shareholders. Nedbank’s transaction was structured around a pro rata acquisition of roughly 66% of NCBA’s issued share capital. Without the exemption, it would have been required to pursue a full 100% offer, a materially different proposition in capital outlay, pricing risk, and post-transaction integration.

The condition attached to the original announcement was clear. The exemption had to be secured by 31 May 2026. Failing that, Nedbank reserved the right to convert the proposal into an alternative 100% offer. The regulator’s decision, therefore, preserves the architecture of the deal as conceived in January. It narrows the uncertainty window and removes one of the more sensitive contingencies.

77.54%: The Mathematics of Control

Alongside the regulatory approval came another update. Nedbank now holds irrevocable undertakings from NCBA shareholders representing approximately 77.54% of the issued share capital, up from 71.2% at the time of the 21 January 2026 announcement.

That number deserves scrutiny. An acquirer seeking approximately 66% ownership, armed with commitments covering 77.54%, is not merely assembling a majority. It is pre-building dominance. Even allowing for pro rata mechanics and potential excess applications, the cushion between the target stake and committed acceptances creates a high probability that the transaction will reach or exceed its intended threshold.

The arithmetic carries strategic weight. At 66%, effective control is already secured in most corporate contexts. At 77.54% of shareholders committing to participate, minority resistance narrows to the margins. Litigation risk falls. Voting outcomes become predictable. The post-deal governance map starts to look less contested.

Yet it stops short of delisting territory. In Kenya, a squeeze-out typically requires 90% acceptance under applicable company law thresholds. Nedbank is not there. The structure leaves NCBA as a public company with a free float, albeit one likely influenced by a dominant South African parent.

That middle ground raises its own questions.

Kenya’s Regulatory Balancing Act

The CMA’s exemption places Kenya’s capital markets regulator in a familiar position. Encourage cross-border capital inflows, deepen banking sector resilience, but preserve market integrity and minority protections.

Granting relief from a mandatory 100% offer suggests that the authority weighed systemic considerations. NCBA is not a peripheral institution. It emerged from the 2019 merger between NIC Group and Commercial Bank of Africa and now ranks among Kenya’s largest banking groups. Its footprint spans retail banking, corporate lending, digital finance, and regional subsidiaries.

Allowing a 66% acquisition without compelling a full takeover reflects regulatory pragmatism. Forcing a 100% bid could have raised the transaction’s capital requirements significantly. That might have deterred the acquirer or altered pricing dynamics. On the other hand, minority shareholders forgo the certainty of a clean exit at a uniform offer price.

The exemption does not eliminate regulatory oversight. The transaction remains subject to other conditions, including competition and prudential approvals. But the core takeover hurdle has been cleared. That tells us something about how Kenyan authorities currently view foreign strategic investors in the banking sector.

South African Capital, East African Ambition

For Nedbank, this is not opportunistic expansion. It is an attempt to re-anchor its African strategy after years of uneven continental bets by South African banks. The region north of the Limpopo has delivered mixed results for several institutions. Some retrenched. Others recalibrated.

Kenya offers scale and a relatively sophisticated financial system. It also offers exposure to East African Community markets through NCBA’s regional network. By targeting approximately 66% rather than 100%, Nedbank limits upfront capital deployment while securing operational control. The structure reduces acquisition cost relative to a full buyout and preserves some local shareholder participation.

There is also a governance calculus. Maintaining a listed subsidiary can ease regulatory relations, preserve local board representation, and maintain liquidity for domestic investors. It softens the optics of foreign control.

Still, 77.54% in irrevocable undertakings suggests that local capital is willing to cede majority control. That willingness may reflect pricing terms, long-term capital needs, or a recognition that banking competition is intensifying across East Africa. Digital lenders, telecom-linked financial platforms, and regional rivals are compressing margins. Scale increasingly matters.

The Capital Structure Question

A 66% stake introduces structural questions that go beyond headlines.

How will capital be allocated between Johannesburg and Nairobi? Will NCBA’s balance sheet support regional expansion under a new majority owner, or will dividend flows migrate south to support group-level metrics? South African banks operate under strict prudential regimes. Kenyan regulators will watch intra-group exposures and capital buffers closely.

There is also the matter of currency risk. Earnings generated in Kenyan shillings will consolidate into a South African reporting currency. Volatility can distort headline performance. Hedging strategies are not trivial at this scale.

Then there is culture. Mergers on paper rarely capture the human dimension. NCBA’s identity is rooted in Kenyan corporate history. Nedbank’s governance culture reflects decades within South Africa’s regulatory and political context. Board dynamics, executive appointments, risk appetite. These are not mechanical adjustments.

Control at 66% allows strategic direction to flow from the majority shareholder. It does not guarantee seamless alignment.

Minority Shareholders in the New Order

With the CMA exemption granted, minority NCBA shareholders will not automatically receive a mandatory 100% offer. Their position becomes more nuanced.

They remain invested in a bank that will be majority-owned by a foreign institution. Liquidity may narrow if free float declines. Influence diminishes. Yet there are potential upsides. A stronger capital base, improved access to group expertise, and enhanced regional reach could lift long-term valuation.

The question is pricing discipline. If 77.54% have committed to accept, the transaction is unlikely to falter absent regulatory surprises. Minority investors who decline the offer will need to assess whether remaining invested under new control aligns with their risk tolerance and return expectations.

The CMA’s role does not end with the exemption. Market conduct oversight, disclosure standards, and minority protections remain active levers. The regulator has opted for flexibility on takeover mechanics. It will be expected to remain firm on governance.

A Deal That Reshapes the Map Without Erasing It

This transaction does not erase NCBA’s public listing. It does not deliver 100% ownership. It does not collapse the Kenyan entity into a branch network.

Instead, it creates a layered structure: South African majority ownership at approximately 66%, reinforced by 77.54% shareholder commitments, with the remainder in public hands. That structure reflects compromise. It accommodates regulatory caution, capital constraints, and strategic ambition in one design.

The CMA exemption by 19 February 2026 closed a critical loop ahead of the 31 May 2026 deadline. The remaining conditions, detailed in the January announcement, still stand. Competition authorities, prudential regulators, and potentially central bank approvals will shape the final timeline.

Yet the core political question has been answered. Kenya is open to majority foreign control of a major bank, provided the structure respects local market frameworks.

The Nedbank NCBA deal now moves from regulatory suspense to execution risk. Integration, capital discipline, and regional growth will determine whether 66% becomes the foundation of a durable East African platform or an expensive foothold in a competitive terrain.

For now, the numbers speak clearly. 66% targeted. 77.54% committed. Exemption granted on 19 February 2026. The rest will play out in boardrooms.

Go to TECHTRENDSKE.co.ke for more tech and business news from the African continent and across the world. 

Follow us on WhatsApp, Telegram, Twitter, and Facebook, or subscribe to our weekly newsletter to ensure you don’t miss out on any future updates. Send tips to editorial@techtrendsmedia.co.ke