KRA’s Merchant Tax Compliance Certificate and the New Compliance Era
A new compliance certificate pulls everyday transactions into the centre of tax enforcement, leaving less room between how business is done and how it is reported
Tax compliance in Kenya is moving from periodic filing toward continuous verification. The Kenya Revenue Authority’s proposed Merchant Tax Compliance Certificate ties eligibility for compliance status to full adoption of the Electronic Tax Invoice Management System, placing transaction-level reporting at the centre of tax administration. Compliance is no longer treated as an annual or monthly exercise. It becomes a condition embedded in everyday business activity, where sales, expenses and deductions must exist within a verifiable electronic record before they are recognised by the tax system.
The distinction is not cosmetic. A traditional Tax Compliance Certificate confirms that filings exist and payments have been made. The new approach draws compliance into day-to-day transactions. Businesses will not only declare income. They will need to demonstrate that their commercial activity is captured electronically at source through eTIMS invoices. Compliance becomes embedded in how trade is recorded, not merely how it is reported later.
This reflects a broader direction in tax administration. Authorities increasingly rely on data trails rather than declarations. The aim is less about catching errors after the fact and more about reducing the space where discrepancies arise in the first place.
The Logic Behind eTIMS Enforcement
eTIMS has been positioned as a VAT tool, but its implications extend further. Every electronic invoice creates a data point. Over time, those points form a record of economic activity that can be cross-checked against income tax filings, withholding tax submissions and customs data.
KRA has already begun automatic validation of declared income and expenses using these datasets from January 1. That move changes the relationship between taxpayer and authority. Returns are no longer taken at face value. They are measured against parallel records generated elsewhere in the economy.
The incentive structure becomes clear when access to a compliance certificate is tied to this system. Businesses require these certificates for government tenders, licensing processes, customs clearance and other routine operations. Compliance stops being an abstract requirement and becomes operational necessity.
There is also an administrative motive. VAT collections have reportedly risen to between Sh28 billion and Sh30 billion per month, up from about Sh20 billion following tighter enforcement around electronic invoicing. That outcome reinforces the institutional belief that digital capture produces measurable revenue gains.
Level Playing Field or Expanded Surveillance
KRA frames the certificate as a way to level competition among businesses. The argument is familiar. Firms that record transactions accurately face higher visible tax costs than those operating partly outside formal systems. Standardising invoice reporting reduces that imbalance.
Yet the expansion of data visibility introduces tension. Businesses accustomed to flexibility in expense recording now face a system where deductions must be supported by verifiable electronic invoices. Informal practices, once tolerated or overlooked, become harder to sustain.
The practical effect may be uneven. Larger firms with structured accounting systems adapt faster. Smaller enterprises, especially those operating in mixed formal and informal environments, face adjustment costs. Adoption requires software changes, training and behavioural change among staff who may still treat invoicing as an afterthought.
The policy question is less about intent and more about pace. Enforcement tools that move faster than business adaptation risk creating compliance bottlenecks rather than improving accuracy.
The Expanding Net Around Income Declaration
The introduction of income and expense validation reflects a deeper concern within revenue administration. KRA’s audit of withholding tax records uncovered significant gaps between income declared by taxpayers and payments reported by third parties. In some cases, taxpayers filed nil returns despite evidence of commercial transactions.
Authorities say 392,162 firms and individuals owe Sh759.7 billion following these reviews. The scale matters because it reframes enforcement from isolated audits to systemic correction. Travel restrictions, asset freezes and PIN deactivation are no longer theoretical tools. They become mechanisms within a broader data-driven enforcement model.
The inclusion of individuals earning more than Sh24,000 per month within this validation framework also signals a widening focus beyond corporate taxpayers. Compliance expectations are moving down the income ladder, reflecting pressure on government revenue following years of heavy borrowing.
Revenue Pressure and Institutional Momentum
Tax policy rarely operates in isolation from fiscal reality. Kenya’s revenue authorities face rising debt obligations alongside public resistance to new taxes. Expanding compliance becomes the politically safer path compared to introducing additional levies.
Digital systems offer administrative leverage. Once established, they reduce reliance on manual audits and discretionary enforcement. The attraction for institutions is obvious. Data scales more easily than personnel.
Still, technology does not resolve structural tensions. Businesses often argue that compliance costs accumulate even when tax rates remain unchanged. Each new reporting requirement adds administrative friction. Over time, the burden becomes part of the economic calculation of operating formally.
Where the System May Be Heading
The Merchant Tax Compliance Certificate suggests an endpoint where tax administration becomes largely automated. Transactions generate records. Records inform assessments. Compliance status updates continuously rather than annually.
That trajectory carries consequences beyond revenue collection. Access to government contracts, licences and even financing increasingly depends on verified tax standing. A compliance certificate becomes less a document and more a passport into formal economic participation.
There is also a cultural dimension. Kenyan tax enforcement has long oscillated between strict enforcement campaigns and periods of lax oversight. A system anchored in continuous digital verification reduces that oscillation. Enforcement becomes routine, less visible but more persistent.
Whether this produces trust or resistance depends on execution. Businesses tend to accept strict rules when they appear consistent. They resist when enforcement feels uneven or opaque. The success of the new certificate will depend less on technology than on whether the system is perceived as fair.
For now, the direction is clear. Compliance is moving upstream, closer to the transaction itself. Once that architecture is in place, reversing it becomes unlikely.
[Secure Your Seat at Africa Tech Summit Nairobi 2026 | February 11–12 here] Use code TTRENDS10 at checkout to save 10% on your pass and join the leaders building Africa’s $1 trillion cross-border payment future.
Go to TECHTRENDSKE.co.ke for more tech and business news from the African continent.
Follow us on WhatsApp, Telegram, Twitter, and Facebook, or subscribe to our weekly newsletter to ensure you don’t miss out on any future updates. Send tips to editorial@techtrendsmedia.co.ke
