The Meta AI Culture Crisis Explained: Leaked Memo Reveals Internal Dysfunction Despite Big-Name Hires

Meta’s sudden pivot in artificial intelligence isn’t just about ambition. It’s about survival.

Over the past few weeks, the tech giant has launched a hiring spree that pulled in some of the brightest minds from OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Anthropic. The centerpiece? A new Superintelligence lab led by Alexandr Wang, Scale AI’s high-profile founder, reportedly recruited with a mandate to push Meta toward AGI dominance.

But behind the headlines, there’s a deeper rot.

One outgoing Meta researcher didn’t mince words. In a private note shared with colleagues and later leaked to industry insiders, he likened the company’s internal dysfunction to a “metastatic cancer” — a metaphor not for technological stagnation, but for the cultural decay spreading through Meta’s AI research ecosystem.

“We’re not failing because we lack talent,” the researcher wrote. “We’re failing because the culture actively corrodes innovation.”

That diagnosis, echoed quietly by others inside Meta’s generative AI division, paints a stark contrast to the company’s public image of progress and reinvention.

Talent in, Talent out

Meta’s AI talent war hasn’t exactly been one-sided. For every celebrated hire, the company has seen exits that suggest internal friction. Industry analysts say this exodus is not just a brain drain—it’s a red flag.

In the last year alone, Meta has lost high-level engineers and research scientists to startups, rivals, or burnout. Some former staff describe a lack of autonomy, sluggish internal processes, and what one called “performative ambition”—an obsession with appearances over substance.

Meta’s AI culture, according to several current and former employees, rewards flashy demos and celebrity researchers while burying systemic issues beneath layers of bureaucracy.

The Zuckerberg Factor

At the top sits Mark Zuckerberg, whose pivot to open-source AI and agentic models like LLaMA 3 has drawn both applause and criticism. Some insiders praise his willingness to open Meta’s models to the public. Others say it’s a gamble meant to distract from the company’s lag in consumer-facing AI applications, like voice agents and creative tools.

“Meta is chasing relevance in AI by brute force,” said one former team lead who left in early 2025. “But culture eats strategy. You can’t hire your way out of structural rot.”

The Superintelligence Gamble

The formation of Meta’s Superintelligence Lab is the boldest signal yet of how seriously the company is taking its AI deficit. But critics warn that importing external leadership—no matter how talented—won’t fix a company culture some now see as unfixable.

Alexandr Wang, despite his impressive credentials, is stepping into a machine that chews up visionaries. If Meta’s deeper issues go unaddressed, he may become the latest high-profile casualty.

Not Just a Meta Problem?

The Meta AI culture crisis is part of a broader reckoning across Big Tech. As the race toward AGI intensifies, internal cultures are becoming battlegrounds. How much autonomy do researchers have? Are ethics teams empowered or sidelined? Is the pursuit of scale eroding the space to experiment?

At Meta, the answers remain murky.

Final Word

While Meta’s latest AI reinvention signals urgency and ambition, insiders say the real threat isn’t technical. It’s cultural. If Meta doesn’t cure the “metastatic cancer” eating away at its research environment, even the best minds in AI may not be enough.

Mark your calendars! TechTrends Pulse lands in Nairobi this August! Join top tech leaders, innovators & AI experts for a half-day of keynotes, showcases & sharp insights on business transformation. RSVP now -limited slots available! Register here.

Follow us on WhatsApp, Telegram, Twitter, and Facebook, or subscribe to our weekly newsletter to ensure you don’t miss out on any future updates. Send tips to editorial@techtrendsmedia.co.ke