How the AI Investment Bubble Is Being Fueled by Shifting Buzzwords and Legal Loopholes

Artificial intelligence isn’t just a technology anymore—it’s a marketing language. As tech giants pour hundreds of billions into generative AI with unclear returns, a growing number of observers are asking: Is this an innovation wave, or an investment bubble powered by shifting buzzwords?

In 2025, Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, Google, and Tesla are projected to spend over $560 billion collectively on AI-related infrastructure and development. Yet the combined expected revenue from these efforts may not even hit $35 billion.

Worse, no one seems to agree on what they’re actually building.

From AI to AGI to Superintelligence to… Whatever Comes Next

There was a time when simply saying “AI” was enough to signal futuristic ambition. But over the past two decades, and especially in the last five years, that term has splintered into AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), Superintelligence, Personal Superintelligence, and even Humanist Superintelligence—each more abstract than the last.

This rebranding carousel isn’t just semantic. It reflects a deeper problem: no one knows what the endpoint of this spending actually is, and the shifting terms often mask how far we still are from truly intelligent systems.

Even the deal between Microsoft and OpenAI hinges on vague definitions. According to OpenAI’s own charter, AGI is “a highly autonomous system that outperforms humans at most economically valuable work.” But if OpenAI declares that it’s achieved this, Microsoft could lose access to the tech it helped fund—unless they can prove it hasn’t reached what’s called “sufficient AGI,” loosely defined as being worth $100 billion in future profits.

That’s not just technical vagueness. It’s a legal and financial house of cards.

Superintelligence: The New “AI Washing”

As AGI becomes too vague or controversial, companies are inventing new terms to give their efforts a fresh sheen:

• Meta has pivoted to “Personal Superintelligence,” framing its efforts as empowering individuals with powerful AI tools—not just chasing big productivity metrics.
• Microsoft, constrained by its OpenAI contracts, is branding its work as “Humanist Superintelligence,” focusing on solving societal problems—while sidestepping AGI entirely.
• Apple, ever the branding expert, insists it’s not building AI at all. It’s crafting “Apple Intelligence.” Of course.

These labels don’t reflect actual capability differences. They reflect marketing strategy—and legal maneuvering. And in doing so, they further blur the already fuzzy line between real AI advancement and illusion.

The Real Winners? Hardware Vendors

If there’s one clear beneficiary in all this, it’s NVIDIA.

Its dominance in AI chips has made it the foundation of the entire generative AI boom. The company now derives nearly 90% of its revenue from AI-related demand, mostly from hyperscalers like Microsoft, Amazon, and Google. But that concentration is fragile. If those companies cut spending, NVIDIA’s meteoric rise could falter—and with it, a large portion of the S&P 500’s growth engine.

AI’s Productivity Problem

For all the talk about intelligence and transformation, generative AI still struggles with a basic business question: what’s the return on investment?

Few companies can point to specific, reliable revenue from AI products. Many tools are experimental, free, or bundled with existing services. Enterprise adoption is cautious. Consumers remain uncertain about long-term utility.

Unlike the cloud or mobile eras, there is no “iPhone moment” for AI. Not yet.

And as companies race to develop frontier models, they burn staggering amounts of compute and capital—often just to maintain brand relevance in the AI arms race.

So, Is This a Bubble?

Let’s count the signs:

• Unsustainable Spending: Hundreds of billions in capex with modest returns.
• Vague Value Propositions: Hype terms shift faster than the tech evolves.
• Marketing Over Substance: From “Personal Superintelligence” to “Apple Intelligence,” terminology often masks limitations.
• Investor Concentration: The S&P 500 is disproportionately exposed to a handful of companies gambling on speculative AI futures.
• No Clear Monetization Path: Even the most advanced models struggle to prove enduring, scalable value.

This doesn’t mean AI won’t change the world. But right now, it’s changing marketing decks a lot faster than it’s changing balance sheets.

The Bottom Line

We’re watching an entire industry sprint toward a finish line that keeps moving—and may not even exist in the way it’s been described. As terms like AGI, Superintelligence, and “Personal AI” get thrown around with increasing abandon, it becomes harder to tell if we’re witnessing progress or just very expensive storytelling.

Until revenue catches up with rhetoric—and definitions stop being strategic—the AI investment bubble remains a very real risk.

Follow us on WhatsApp, Telegram, Twitter, and Facebook, or subscribe to our weekly newsletter to ensure you don’t miss out on any future updates. Send tips to editorial@techtrendsmedia.co.ke