Currently, the arrest and indictment of Pavel Durov, CEO of Telegram, has sparked an international debate on levels of free speech and the responsibilities imposed on tech tycoons.
The case extrapolated from France will be looming for the future of Telegram and will raise fundamental questions about the online censorship process. Durov had been held in Paris in August for not doing anything against criminal acts on the platform charged with allegations that could carry a sentence of up to ten years if proven; he is currently on bail.
Durov, the founder of VKontakte and Telegram, is a staunch defender of online privacy and freedom of expression. Almost one billion users communicate openly within their walls, while at the same time, its unpoliced terrain has, in many cases, created a breeding ground for illicit activity.
Last August, Durov was arrested in France after an extensive investigation regarding Telegram hadn’t been settled. French authorities laid eyes on Telegram for months due to thousands of legal requests unanswered in relation to criminal activity. They viewed Durov’s silence to be equivalent to complicity. The arrest sent shockwaves through the tech world and made counter-reactions even from some like Tucker Carlson and Elon Musk in defense of Durov.
This case illustrates how freedom of speech collides with protection of society. While Durov champions unfettered expression, his critics state that he ignores the detrimental effects of allowing unchallenged content. The very nature of how Telegram has set about moderating its contents tells a story of gradual transformation. Until recently, it seemed to be pulling back; now it can be seen initiating cooperation with law enforcement agencies like Europol to eradicate terrorist content, suggesting a growing awareness of a responsibility.
Durov’s arrest and indictment on charges including complicity to organized crime have reached a significant juncture for Telegram. This case could have healing ramifications for the company and the ongoing discourse on platform accountability. It lays bare the growing concern among the state in this regard.
The Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) ordered Telegram suspension recently, citing misuse by criminals-including undermining national examinations. The CA further blasted Telegram for not responding to requests for the removal of harmful content when other platforms complied.
The ban inconvenienced users, restricting access to apps and websites. The CA ordered the block of Telegram by mobile network operators during KCSE examination hours, until November 22, 2024. However, users went around the ban with the help of VPNs.
Despite these and many other legal hurdles, Telegram claims to show strong growth-much of it attributable to crypto-activity-in its unaudited financial results for H1 2024. 525 million dollars were brought in as revenue and 335 million dollars as profit after tax-the first annual profit by Telegram, if so. The growth in digital assets went from 400 million dollars to 1.3 billion dollars. Albeit, almost half of revenue was reported from a one-off deal, since cancelled, giving advertisers the right to pay for small business ads via Toncoin. Since Durov was arrested, the value of Toncoin diminished by 10%, according to the company.
Durov referred to these as growing pains, and since then, he has been pursuing the introduction of several measures to render Telegram safer. They are the removal of the People Nearby feature, the disabling of uploading new media to Telegra.ph, the formation of a dedicated moderation team that utilizes AI to monitor the in-app search tool, and new privacy policy guidelines that widen the information shared with government authorities related to criminal activity. Telegram continues to monetize mainly through advertisements and subscriptions and is committed to improving its content moderation in the face of criticism about illegal content.
The case of Durov represents not only the destiny of an individual and the interests of one company; it is a microcosm of something larger. As technology continues to grow, society has generally been preoccupied with the many complications that arise with themes such as online content moderation, the rights of the platforms, and the thin divide that separates freedom from security. For the foreseeable future, Telegram and the broader tech industry will have to be careful in balancing these opposed values.
Follow us on WhatsApp, Telegram, Twitter, and Facebook, or subscribe to our weekly newsletter to ensure you don’t miss out on any future updates. Send tips to editorial@techtrendsmedia.co.ke
